A Country That Sends HWP Files Over Telegram
"I couldn't care less what Jensen Huang does. I'm too busy just trying to get by... ...Exporting technology to Germany since 2019... But in the domestic market...
AI Summary
South Korean AI companies that successfully export technology abroad are blocked at home by overlapping regulations and buck-passing bureaucracies, while government funding arrives only in small tranches sufficient for demonstrations rather than full deployment. The sector's terminology — 'sovereign AI,' 'AI top three' — floats untethered from measurable standards or coherent policy. The disconnect is laid bare by a single image: the same legislators sponsoring cloud and AI bills still exchange HWP documents over Telegram.
Honestly, I couldn't care less what Jensen Huang announces on stage. For someone just trying to make ends meet, that keynote is someone else's party. The reality pressing at your feet lies elsewhere.
A company that has been exporting technology to Germany since 2019 finds itself blocked by regulatory walls in the domestic market. Obstacles that never existed when selling to Germany or Japan pile up on domestic projects. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport approvals stack on top of national security facility regulations, and civil servants caught in the middle pass the buck to avoid accountability. Foreign buyers are ready to pay — but the domestic structure won't let it happen.
As the boom cooled, roughly 90 percent of related startups worldwide disappeared. Companies are now left picking up the unfinished projects those startups never completed — yet domestic support is criticized as 'piecemeal.' The trillions of won the government boasts of pouring into the sector were mostly parceled out in small amounts that stopped at the demonstration stage. The money was never there to back you all the way through; it was just enough to put on a show once.
The terminology is a mess too. Phrases like 'sovereign AI' and 'AI top three' mean something different to everyone who utters them. Defining a concept requires a measurement standard to accompany it, but only slogans without metrics drift around. Telling people to wait until domestically developed technology is mature before adopting it is equally problematic. Clearly dividing the roles of government and the private sector would come far closer to genuine 'demand creation.'
The most telling image is the scene itself. Members of the National Assembly who have never once used a cloud service sponsor cloud legislation. They say AI is critical, yet the National Assembly still sends HWP files back and forth over Telegram. The government projects that rolled along on top of those habits produced nothing but shelf-ware that nobody actually uses. Look at the tools in the hands of those chanting 'AI top three,' and the distance between slogan and reality becomes roughly apparent.
Source: Naver Premium pickool
This article was automatically translated from the Korean original by AI. For the authoritative version, read it in Korean.
한국어 원문 읽기 →